<empty> <empty> <empty>
<empty>
our guidelines
<empty>
<empty> <empty> <empty>
<empty> <empty> <empty>
<empty>
<empty> Introduction
<empty> Legal
<empty> The Categories
<empty> Main Issues
<empty> Categories
<empty> Rejects
<empty> Appeals

<empty>

Introduction

i. The British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) is an independent, non-governmental body funded through the fees it charges to those who submit films, videos, DVDs and video games for classification.

ii. The BBFC classifies films on behalf of the local authorities who license cinemas under the Licensing Act 2003.

iii. The BBFC classifies videos, DVDs and some video games under the Video Recordings Act 1984.  (The video games covered by the VRA are those whose exemption is forfeited under section 2(2) because they depict human sexual activity, gross violence or other matters of concern.)

iv. The BBFC will not classify material which it believes to be in breach of the criminal law.

v. Where possible the BBFC will carry out its responsibilities through appropriate use of the classification categories, particularly in order to protect children from actual or potential harm.  If necessary, however, the Board may cut or even reject a film, video, DVD or video game.  The Board's approach to rejects is set out at the end of these Guidelines.

vi. In line with domestic administrative law principles and the requirements of the Human Rights Act 1998, there is a particular need to make the classification criteria clear. This is fulfilled by the publication of these Guidelines and their availability on the BBFC website (http://www.bbfc.co.uk) or directly from the Board.

vii. The detail of the Guidelines is contained in the following pages.  But it is right to set out here the general underlying grounds on which the Board exercises the broad discretion conferred on it.  There are three main considerations:

  • is the material in conflict with the law?
  • is the material, at the age group concerned, likely to be harmful?
  • is the material, at the age group concerned, clearly unacceptable to broad public opinion?  (It is on this ground, for example, that the Board intervenes in respect of language.  This ground also applies at '18', although here it is balanced against the public expectation that adults should be free to choose their entertainment, within the law.)

viii. The BBFC Classification Guidelines reflect all these considerations and others set out later. They are the product also of public consultation, research and the accumulated experience of the BBFC over many years.

ix. The Guidelines, however, are not a legal document and should be interpreted in the spirit of what is intended as well as in the letter. They cannot be a comprehensive account of everything that may at any time be of concern. Should issues arise which are not specifically covered here, they will be dealt with by the BBFC on their merits and in line with the standards expressed and implied generally.

x. Responsibility for the Guidelines and for their interpretation rests with the BBFC and is subject to normal considerations of fairness and reasonableness.

xi. The BBFC undertakes to provide guidance on the interpretation of these Guidelines at any time.

<empty>
<empty> <empty> <empty>

Classification Summary

BBFC RSS News Feed

Connect to the bbfc via our RSS feeds. Our feeds give you up to the minute information on all our classification decisions.

RSS :

Most recent film

Film

CHAMKU

Contains frequent strong violence and one use of strong language

Last update 27/08/2008



Visit the BBFC’s other websites

Link to PBBFC - the bbfc website for parents
Information for parents
Link to cbbfc - the bbfc website for children
For children aged 5-12, their parents and teachers
Link to the sbbfc - the bbfc website for students
For students of media regulation and film.

Print this page

All content © bbfc 2005 unless otherwise stated.
This page can be viewed at : http://www.bbfc.org.uk/policy/index.php
Page Printed : Wednesday 27 August 2008